By Tshediso Matona (Commissioner: B-BBEE Commission)
For me as the Commissioner for Black Economic Empowerment, a positive factor of the current sharp spotlight on BEE is the louder and widening conversation ensuing in the country about BEE policy and legislation.
When BEE and transformation are understood as a tool to correct racial inequality that our economy inherited from apartheid and colonialism, it becomes clear that it is a matter of existential importance which we do need conversation about, because transformation is an ongoing project; a work-in-progress. Equally, it is a matter that deserves to be engaged with respect, integrity and nation-building responsibility, because it is about our painful past and our desired future; as such, our debates must be fruitful and take the country forward.
Moreover, whatever US President Trump’s quarrel is with BEE, the events ensuing from it serve to affirm to South Africans that transformation is our domestic, sovereign issue, rooted in our circumstances, and best answered by none other than ourselves. This moment prompts us to recall that it is we, the people of South Africa, black and white, who proclaimed in our Constitution that “We Recognise the injustices of the past” and “Believe that SA belongs to all who live in it” and that we commit to “Heal divisions of the past and establish a society based on social justice”; and to this end to adopt “laws and other measures to advance persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination”, including the use of preferential procurement.
Any ideas that lower the bar of our values and ideals seek to place us in reverse-gear as a country when we ought to be accelerating forward.
Ironically, BEE follows in the footsteps of affirmative action, a policy born out of the self-same US. It is based on the principle that to achieve social justice, governments are enjoined to take proactive and targeted measures for the socio-economic upliftment and inclusion of certain population groups, as this would not be achieved by market forces on their own. This is practised in many countries and has evolved into formal global policies, such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, or the Sustainable Development Goals under the UN, and the emerging corporate Environment, Social and Governance standards.
My view is that the newly emerging challenges against BEE, whether emanating within the country or sponsored from outside, are in fact an opportunity for us to deepen and discipline our dialogue about transformation as a nation. In doing so we need to be honest that transformation is an unfinished business, and to find each other about the imperative for changing the status-quo of living with the worst inequality in the world.
To this end, the correct place to proceed from is accepting that BEE was created as a tool to solve the inherited problem of a racially skewed ownership, opportunities, and participation in the economy. At the same time, it is acknowledged that BEE as a transformation tool might not be working perfectly, and indeed many shortcomings and loopholes about BEE are being encountered. But this cannot justify this being mischievously exploited by those who now pretend that the problem for which BEE seeks to solve is no longer an issue. Such mischief amounts to a negation of our collective duty to implement the Constitution and correct the economic injustice inherited from our past
Read the full story in the 24th edition of Impumelelo: Top Empowerment and find out what the numbers say about transformation in South Africa.
